initial public offerings (IPOs) trading on American exchanges
Showing posts with label IPO photos. Show all posts
Showing posts with label IPO photos. Show all posts

Friday, April 12, 2024

UL Solutions Inc. (ULS) began trading on the NYSE on Fri 12 Apr 24

UL Solutions delivers testing, inspection and certification services, together with software products and advisory offerings, that support our customers’ product innovation and business growth. UL Solutions helps to obtain all needed testing, certifications, validations, approvals etc. to enter global markets.
UL Solutions Inc. is a subsidiary of ULSE Inc.
  • Sector(s): Industrials
  • Industry: Specialty Business Services
  • Full Time Employees: 14,892
  • Founded in 1894 
  • Headquartered in Northbrook, Illinois
  • https://www.ul.com
 UL Solutions Inc. priced 33.8 mln share IPO at $28.00 per share, at the higher end of the $26-29 expected range.



Thursday, June 20, 2019

Slack (WORK) began trading on the NYSE on Thur 20 June 2019

Slack directly listed its shares on the New York Stock Exchange, bypassing the usual fundraising process of an IPO and allowing shareholders to sell right away without a lockup period.
  • No lock-up for insiders next week 
  • A parallel for this unusual type of stock listing is Spotify Technology SA. The music-streaming provider went public using a similar maneuver last year, the last high-profile company to do so. Spotify’s stock is up 14% since then.
  • Goldman Sachs Group Inc., Morgan Stanley and Allen & Co. advised Slack on the listing, the same trio of banks that lined up when Spotify went public.
  • Opened for trading at $38.50.

Slack is an internet-based platform that allows teams and businesses to communicate with each other. It organizes discussions by topic and group, is similar to instant messaging chatrooms, and allows cooperation on documents and files.

Launched in 2013, Slack has replaced e-mail discussions at many companies, although e-mail is still the dominant medium of communication in workplaces.

Slack CEO Stewart Butterfield outside the New York Stock Exchange on Thursday morning. 


  

Slack Chief Executive Officer Stewart Butterfield said Thursday that the company chose not to have a traditional IPO for a pragmatic reason: It didn’t need the cash. “We’re not ideological crusaders on this stuff,” he said. The direct listing process is a more efficient way to price a stock, he said, “but I don’t think anything comes close to not having to dilute existing shareholders by 10%.”

Butterfield said he also wanted to avoid the lockup period. “Especially in a period when you’re locked up, when the supply is so constrained, the psychological impact of that can be a big negative,” he said. “Giving employees the option early is more important.”
Slack going public ends a long journey that started with Tiny Speck, a small video game maker. The company, led by Butterfield, was making a game called Glitch, but it didn’t take off. The team, however, had built an internal tool to chat and share files with each other. They had an inkling that the software could be useful to other teams. In 2014, they launched Slack. Now Butterfield, its co-founder and chief executive officer, is worth more than $1 billion.

One of Slack’s earliest believers was Accel, a venture firm that now owns about 24% of the company. Andrew Braccia, an Accel partner and Slack board member, had worked with Butterfield at Yahoo! Bloomberg Beta, the venture capital arm of Bloomberg LP, is also a Slack investor.

The service has spread from Silicon Valley into offices around the world, and it does much more than chat. Users can share files, build automated workflows, host video calls, poll colleagues and keep a to-do list. Those who use it tend to adapt quickly, but it has struggled to convey exactly what it is to most of the world, Butterfield said in a recent conference call. “We have to work hard to explain Slack to all the people who have never used it before,” he said. Butterfield called it “one of our biggest challenges and greatest opportunities.”

Slack faces competition from some of the world’s most valuable companies, including Microsoft Corp., Alphabet Inc. and Facebook Inc. Slack did prevail, however, over another rival: HipChat, a product from Atlassian Corp. Last year, Slack and Atlassian struck a deal in which Slack bought the assets for HipChat, which was eventually wound down, and Atlassian took a stake in Slack.

Ten million people use Slack every day, according to the company. Many workers rely on a free version of the software, but as of April, 645 companies paid more than $100,000 a year for the service. Those big customers make up about 43% of Slack’s revenue, the company said. Like other big-name public debuts this year, Slack is not profitable. It lost $139 million on $401 million of revenue in the fiscal year that ended in January.

In contrast to the flagrant cash burning of companies like Uber or Lyft, Slack’s losses have been fairly consistent. But its revenue growth rate has slowed from 110% two years ago to a projected 50% for the fiscal year ending next January.

SLACK valuation
2014: $1.2bn
2015: $2.8bn
2016: $3.8bn
2017: $5.1bn
2018: $7.1bn
2019: $17bn (IPO)

Clients
The San Francisco-based company, whose customers include Electronic Arts Inc, Nordstrom Inc and Ford Motor Co, said it ended the first quarter with 95,000 paid customers.

Slack had more than 500,000 organizations on its free subscription plan, as of Jan. 31.

As of April 30, Slack had 645 paid customers with over $100,000 in annual recurring revenue, an 84% increase from a year earlier, and these large customers accounted for 43% of its total revenue.

Slack also said it had over 10 million daily active users.

Competition
Its closest competitor is Microsoft Teams, a free chat add-on for Microsoft Corp’s Office365 users. Other similar platforms include Google Hangouts, Workplace by Facebook and Cisco Systems Inc’s Webex Teams.

The global market for workplace collaboration is expected to hit $3.2 billion by 2021, according to research firm IDC.

While Slack is not yet profitable, it’s got liquidity. The company reported cash and cash equivalents of $841 million in its most recent fiscal year, which is enough to keep the company going for nearly a decade based on its current pace of cash outflow.

Friday, May 10, 2019

Uber Technologies Inc. (UBER) began trading on the NYSE on 10 May 2019

Uber (UBER 41.57, -3.43, -7.6%) made its public debut on Friday, although the price action was much more subdued than past IPOs this year.

  • The ride-hailing giant priced shares in the IPO Thursday at $45 each, raising $8.1 billion and giving the company a valuation of $82 billion.
  • Trading began at about $42.50, compared with the $45 paid by investors allocated stock in the initial sale, which was already at the lower end of the $44-$50 range.
  • Uber closed the day at $41.57, down 7.6% from last night’s IPO price.







Uber Technologies Inc. CEO Dara Khosrowshah (C) and early employee Austin Geidt (in red) ring the opening bell of the trading session on the New York Stock Exchange



Khosrowshahi and Uber co-founder Garrett Camp take a selfie photograph on the trading floor of the New York Stock Exchange on Friday


Kalanick (left) stands with his father Donald in the members gallery above the floor of the NYSE


Uber Technologies Inc. CEO Dara Khosrowshahi stands outside the New York Stock Exchange ahead of the company's IPO in New York on Friday


Protestors march through the financial district, demanding fair wages and more transparency during a strike against Uber in San Francisco on Wednesday





Thursday, May 2, 2019

Beyond Meat (BYND) began trading on the Nasdaq on Thur 2 May 2019

  • Beyond Meat has a market value of $3.83 billion at the close of trading.






The shares of Beyond Meat, the purveyor of plant-based burgers and sausages, more than doubled Thursday in its Nasdaq debut. It's the first pure-play maker of vegan "meat" to go public, according to Renaissance Capital, which researches and tracks IPOs.

Beyond Meat raised about $240 million selling 9.6 million shares at $25 each. Those shares rose 163% to close at $65.75.

The 10-year-old company has attracted celebrity investors like Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates and actor Leonardo DiCaprio and buzz for placing its products in burger joints like Carl's Jr. It sells to 30,000 grocery stores, restaurants and schools in the U.S., Canada, Italy, the United Kingdom and Israel.

Beyond Meat CEO Ethan Brown said the IPO timing is right because the company wants to expand overseas. He also wants consumers to be able to buy shares since they have fueled the company's growth.

"It really is a wonderful feeling to be able to welcome people in who have helped this brand," Brown told The Associated Press.

Still, Beyond Meat has never made an annual profit, losing $30 million last year. It's also facing serious competition from other "new meat" companies like Impossible Foods and traditional players like Tyson Foods Inc. Tyson recently sold a stake in Beyond Meat because it plans to develop its own alternative meat.

The IPO comes amid growing consumer interest in plant-based foods for their presumed health and environmental benefits. U.S. sales of plant-based meats jumped 42% between March 2016 and March 2019 to a total of $888 million, according to Nielsen. Traditional meat sales rose 1% to $85 billion in that same time frame.

The trend is a global one. U.K. sales of meat alternatives jumped 18% over the last year, while sales of traditional meat and poultry slid 2%.

Demand is expected to continue to grow. Euromonitor, a consulting firm, predicts worldwide sales of meat substitutes will grow 22% by 2023 to a total of $22.9 billion.

Even Burger King has recognized the appeal. Earlier this week, the fast food chain announced that it would start testing the Impossible Whopper, made with a plant-based burger from Impossible Foods, in additional markets after its monthlong test in St. Louis proved successful. Meanwhile, Ikea says it's working on developing a plant-based Swedish meatball, which it says it plans to test with customers early next year.

Brown says Beyond Meat's ingredient list — it only uses natural ingredients that haven't been genetically modified and doesn't use soy — sets it apart from competitors. Its products are made from pea protein, canola oil, potato starch and other plant-based ingredients. Its burgers "bleed" with beet juice; its sausages are colored with fruit juice.

Unlike competitors, Beyond Meat products have also been sold in the meat section of groceries since 2016. That has broadened their appeal beyond vegetarians. Beyond Meat says a 26-week study last spring showed that 93% of Kroger customers who bought its burgers also bought animal meat during the same period.

In a 2016 taste test, Consumer Reports said the texture of the Beyond Burger was similar to ground beef, but it didn't match up in flavor. The magazine's conclusion: It might not be the best burger you've ever tried, but it's pretty tasty on a bun with lots of toppings.

As for health benefits, the results are mixed. A four-ounce 92% lean burger from Laura's Lean Beef has higher fat and cholesterol than a Beyond Meat burger, but Beyond Meat's burger has higher sodium and carbohydrates and slightly less protein. The lean beef burger is 160 calories; a Beyond Meat burger is 270 calories.

Brown says Beyond Meat is working on reducing sodium, which is a natural byproduct of its manufacturing process. But he also points out that red meat and processed meat have been classified as possible carcinogens by the World Health Organization.

Beyond Meat also costs more. For $5.99, consumers can get two 4-ounce patties of Beyond Burger or four 4-ounce patties of Laura's Lean Beef.

Brown said Beyond Meat has a five-year goal of getting at least one product — most likely beef — to cost less than the animal version. He expects the supply chain will grow as sales expand, which will lower the cost of raw ingredients like peas.

But Beyond Meat touts environmental benefits as well. The company says a plant-based burger takes 99% less water and 93% less land to produce than a beef burger, and generates 90% fewer greenhouse gas emissions.

Beyond Meat was founded in 2009 by Brown, a former clean energy executive. Brown's family part-owned a Maryland dairy farm, so as a child, Brown spent weekends and summers on the farm. As he grew older, he began to question whether people really needed animals to produce meat.

Brown teamed up with two professors from the University of Missouri, Fu-hung Hsieh and Harold Huff, who had been developing soy-based chicken since the 1980s. By 2013, Beyond Meat was selling plant-based chicken strips nationwide at Whole Foods. (The company discontinued chicken earlier this year but says it's working on a better recipe.)

For investors, the stock is not without risk. Amid its annual losses, Beyond Meat must also continue to spend heavily on research and development. The El Segundo, California-based company employs 63 scientists, engineers, researchers, technicians and chefs at its 30,000-square-foot lab. It also has manufacturing facilities in Columbia, Missouri.

Renaissance Capital, which has researched the company, says investors will likely tolerate the losses because the business is growing so quickly. Beyond Meat's net revenue was $87.9 million last year, 170% higher than 2017.

In documents filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Beyond Meat says it will invest $40 million to $50 million in current and new manufacturing facilities and spend $50 million to $60 million on product development and sales. The rest will be used to pay down debt and fund operations.

Thursday, March 21, 2019

Levi Strauss (LEVI) began trading on the NYSE on 21 March 2019

The iconic blue jean maker and clothing retailer has priced its initial public offering of 36.67 mln shares at $17 per share (above the expected $14.00-16.00 range), valuing the company at about $6.6 billion.

  • Opened for trading at $22.22, up 31 percent from its offering price of $17.
  • The 166-year-old company, which owns the Dockers and Denizen brands, previously went public in 1971, but the namesake founder's descendants took it private again in 1985.




The company was founded by Levi Strauss, who immigrated to the United States from Bavaria and set up shop in San Francisco in 1853 with a wholesale dry goods business. Twenty years later, he and a business partner received a patent for “waist overalls” with metal rivets at points of strain — a garment known today as the blue jean.

Levi's employees and owners ring the opening bell on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange on the day that Levi Strauss has returned to the stock market with an IPO on March 21, 2019 in New York City. 



Levi Strauss CEO Chip Bergh poses for photos outside the New York Stock Exchange, Thursday, March 21, 2019. Levi Strauss & Co., which gave America its first pair of blue jeans, is going public for the second time. 


The "No Blue Jeans" rule was relaxed on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange, Thursday, March 21, 2019. 

Levi's employees make free t-shirts outside of the New York Stock Exchange on the day that Levi Strauss has returned to the stock market with an IPO on March 21, 2019 in New York City. 


2nd day

First IPO in 1971:  The 166-year-old company, which owns the Dockers and Denizen brands, previously went public in 1971, but the namesake founder's descendants took it private again in 1985.

Thursday, October 11, 2018

Allogene Therapeutics (ALLO) began trading on the Nasdaq on 11 October 2018

Allogene Therapeutics is a biotechnology company with a mission to catalyze the next revolution in cancer treatment through the development of allogeneic chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapy directed at blood cancers and solid tumors. Founded and led by former Kite Pharma executives.
  • Allogene priced an upsized 18 mln share IPO (from 16 mln shares) at $18.00, the high-end of the expected $16.00-18.00 range, giving the firm a market capitalization of $2.05 billion and making it the largest biotech to go public since 2009.
  • Opened for trading at $22 after pricing IPO at $18
  • Founded in 2017. IPO comes less than a year since the company was formed.
  • CEO David Chang and Chairman Arie Belldegrun’s had management experience at Kite Pharma Inc. In 2017, Gilead Sciences Inc. bought Kite for almost $12 billion after a four-year stint as a public company.
  • HQ: South San Francisco, California-based 
  • https://www.allogene.com/

2nd day of trading


President Nelson Griggs delivers the Opening Bell crystal to Arie Belldegrun, M.D., FACS, Executive Chairman & Co-Founder & David Chang, M.D. Ph.D., President, CEO, & Co-Founder


President Nelson Griggs


By using cells from donors, allogeneic therapies could be made in large batches and be readily available for treatment. The promise is these treatments will reduce costs, and therefore, be used to treat more patients. Gilead’s Yescarta and Novartis’s Kymriah, so far the only two CAR-T therapies approved in the U.S, are priced at $373,000 and $475,000, respectively.

What’s Next
Allogene, which raised $324 million in initial gross proceeds, plans to use the funds to advance so-called off-the-shelf CAR-T therapies that use cells from healthy donors, rather than patients’ own, so they don’t need to be personalized for each cancer patient. Allogene sees initiating human trials for its experimental therapies in non-Hodgkin lymphoma and multiple myeloma next year, and advancing its early-stage study in leukemia in the second half of 2019.

Allogene’s UCART19 is being studied in clinical trials in patients with B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. The company anticipates registrational trials by 2019, along with plans to file an application with the Food and Drug Administration.

Livent (LTHM) began trading on the NYSE on 11 October 2018

  • Livent priced 20 mln share IPO at $17 per share, below the expected $18-20 per share range  that the company had expected in its filing on Oct. 1.
  • The IPO raised $390 million.
  • Livent is the largest lithium pure play trading on a major U.S. stock exchange.
  • Headquarters: Philadelphia, PA
  • Founded: 2018 
  • https://livent.com
  • Both the world's largest and second largest producers of lithium, North Carolina-based Albemarle (NYSE:ALB) and Chile-based Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile, or SQM (NYSE:SQM), respectively, are listed on the NYSE, but neither is a pure play. China's Ganfeng Lithium, FMC, and China's Tianqi Lithium round out the top five players, though not necessarily in that order.


Livent Corporation President and CEO Paul Graves is applauded as he rings a ceremonial bell on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange as his company's IPO begins trading on Thursday.


President and CEO Paul Graves and members of the leadership team from lithium producer Livent Corp ring the opening bell at the New York Stock Exchange


NEW YORK—The market for lithium will remain tight through 2025 as producers struggle to lift output fast enough to meet demand for the material that’s essential in making batteries for electric vehicles, according to the sector’s newest public company, Livent Corp.

“We think demand is going to grow almost five times larger in 2025 than it was in 2017,” chief executive officer Paul Graves said in an interview Thursday in New York, as the supplier made its trading debut. “Our biggest challenge is producing enough to meet the demand — there’s a much greater risk that this market is consistently in a deficit in the near future.”

The longer-term demand outlook from Livent, a spin off from chemical maker FMC Corp., echoes the view from Chinese competitor, Jiangxi Ganfeng Lithium Co., which this week sold shares in Hong Kong for the first time.

Yet investors aren’t immediately swayed, focusing instead on concerns new supply may flood the market in the short term, and on the material’s decline in 2018 after a rally that tripled prices in the three years through 2017.

Shares of Philadelphia-based Livent closed little changed Thursday, while Ganfeng plunged 29 per cent on its Hong Kong debut — even after pricing the shares at the bottom of a target range — before rebounding as much as 13 per cent in early Friday trading.

“The poor performance reflects lack of confidence in the near-term lithium market,” Argonaut Securities (Asia) Ltd. analysts including Helen Lau said in a Friday note. “We think markets have indeed overreacted to the current price performance and overlooked the demand growth prospects.”

Some companies are struggling to raise money for expansion, while others face regulatory hurdles, dimming the supply outlook, said Livent’s Graves, 47, who was FMC’s CFO and worked at Goldman Sachs Group Inc. for 12 years, including as co-head of natural resources in Asia. “Our next priority is to expand our Argentina production as quickly as we can to meet that downstream need,” he said. Livent operates at sites including Salar del Hombre Muerto in Argentina.

There’s a risk of a lithium shortage longer term, particularly from around 2023 to 2024, when production of electric vehicles is likely to accelerate, Ganfeng’s Vice Chairman Wang Xiaoshen said in an interview Tuesday.

Prices of lithium materials, and producer shares, have declined as the sector moved into a period of oversupply after mines fired up in Australia, Bloomberg New Energy Finance analysts including James Frith wrote in a Thursday note. The lithium sector is likely to tighten again by 2024, according to Frith.

Even after the weaker-than-expected trading debuts, lithium companies are likely to raise a record $1 billion (U.S.) on public markets in 2018, Bloomberg NEF said in its note. China’s second-biggest producer, Tianqi Lithium Corp., also plans to sell shares in Hong Kong this year.

In South America, lithium carbonate prices fell to $14,500 per ton in September, from a record high of $15,750 per ton in June, according to Benchmark Mineral Intelligence. The research firm’s gauge of a range prices across the main regions is down 8.2 per cent this year, after climbing 208 per cent in the three years ended Dec. 31.

“I think investors have decided to pause the investments around lithium and cobalt,” Chris Berry, a New York-based analyst and founder of research firm House Mountain Partners LLC, said by phone on Wednesday. In addition to weaker battery metals prices, “everyone’s skittish about China, tariffs, late-cycle economic growth and interest rates on the rise in the U.S.,” he said.